Most SEO advice tells you to "just find better keywords." But when you sit down to actually do it, you're staring at a spreadsheet full of terms with sky-high difficulty scores and search volumes that don't justify the effort. The real skill isn't keyword research in general, it's finding low competition keywords that give you a realistic shot at ranking without needing a domain authority of 80.
The good news: there's a repeatable system for this. You don't need to guess, and you don't need to spend hours manually sifting through keyword tools hoping something sticks. Low competition keywords exist in every niche, you just need to know where to look and how to evaluate them quickly.
This guide walks you through a step-by-step process for uncovering keywords your competitors are overlooking, assessing their true ranking difficulty, and turning them into content that drives traffic. It's the same kind of approach we built into RankYak's automated keyword discovery engine, identifying high-potential, rankable keywords daily so your site grows consistently. Whether you're doing this manually or looking to automate the heavy lifting, you'll walk away with a system that works.
When most people talk about low competition keywords, they fixate on one number: keyword difficulty (KD). A KD of 20 looks easy, a KD of 70 looks impossible, and the search stops there. That instinct isn't wrong, but it's dangerously incomplete. A keyword's true difficulty is a combination of several factors that no single score captures on its own, and treating KD as the final word causes a lot of sites to either chase impossible targets or skip perfectly winnable ones.
Every major keyword tool calculates difficulty differently, but they all rely heavily on the number and strength of backlinks pointing to the pages currently ranking. What they don't measure well is the actual quality of the content on those pages. You can find a keyword with a KD of 45 where the top results are thin, outdated articles on low-authority sites that just happen to have accumulated a handful of aging backlinks. That's a keyword you can beat with a solid, well-structured article, even if your domain is relatively new.
Keyword difficulty tells you about the backlink landscape, not about the content quality gap you can exploit.
Tools also calculate their scores using different data sets and methodologies, so a KD of 30 in one tool might represent a completely different competitive situation than a KD of 30 in another. Use difficulty scores as a first filter, not the final answer. They narrow the field; your SERP audit closes the deal. More on that in Step 3.
Finding low competition keywords comes down to spotting a gap between what searchers need and what currently exists in the results. A keyword becomes genuinely winnable when several signals line up together. Here's what to check:
| Signal | What "winnable" looks like |
|---|---|
| SERP composition | Results from forums, Reddit, or thin listicles dominate the page |
| Domain authority of rankers | Most ranking pages sit on sites with DA below 40 |
| Content quality | Top results are outdated, poorly structured, or miss the full search intent |
| Intent match | Few pages directly answer what the searcher is actually asking |
| Backlink counts | Ranking pages have fewer than 20 to 30 referring domains |
Search intent alignment is especially underrated. A keyword might show modest volume but carry a crystal-clear informational or transactional intent that your content can satisfy completely. When you match intent better than the existing results, you give search engines a strong reason to move your page up, regardless of your domain's age or authority.
A monthly search volume of 200 might sound unimpressive compared to 10,000, but if those 200 searches come from buyers actively researching a purchase, that keyword can drive more revenue than a high-volume term full of casual browsers. Low-volume, high-intent keywords are frequently the most undervalued targets in keyword research, precisely because competitors dismiss them before doing the math.
Your goal isn't to win one massive keyword. It's to build a portfolio where each term is realistically within reach, and where the traffic compounds over time. Fifty well-chosen, low-competition keywords will outperform one ambitious long shot almost every time.
The biggest mistake in keyword research is starting inside a keyword tool. You end up chasing data about what people search for without understanding why they're searching or what stage of the buying process they're in. The smarter starting point is the language real buyers use before they ever type something into Google, because that language maps directly to the kind of specific, low-competition queries that tools tend to undervalue.
Your future customers are already telling you what they need. They post questions in Reddit forums and niche communities, leave detailed reviews on Amazon product pages, ask in Facebook groups, and fill help desk threads with the exact problems they're trying to solve. These places give you unfiltered buyer language that keyword tools rarely surface on their own.
The best seed topics come from real conversations, not spreadsheets.
Here's where to look:
Once you have 10 to 15 raw topics pulled from real buyer conversations, your job is to distill each one into a short phrase that captures the core idea. These become your seed keywords, the starting inputs you'll feed into a keyword tool in Step 2.
Use this simple template to structure your seeds:
| Raw buyer topic | Seed keyword |
|---|---|
| "I don't know which project management tool to pick" | "project management tool comparison" |
| "How do I get my Shopify store to show up on Google" | "Shopify SEO setup" |
| "I keep losing clients after the first month" | "client retention strategies" |
Finding low competition keywords becomes much more reliable when your seeds come from real buyer intent rather than broad guesses. Each topic you pull from a genuine buyer conversation carries a built-in signal about what people actually need, and that makes every downstream keyword more likely to match intent and convert.
With your seed keywords ready, the next move is to expand each one into a list of specific, long-tail variations. Long-tail keywords (phrases of three to five words or more) are where most of the low competition opportunity lives. They get fewer searches individually, but they also face far less competition, and they tend to convert better because searchers who use specific phrases know exactly what they want.
Take each seed keyword and combine it with a set of modifier words that reflect how real people search. These modifiers signal intent, context, and specificity, which is exactly what makes them easier to rank for than broad head terms.

Here's a modifier framework you can apply to any seed keyword:
| Modifier type | Examples | Result (using "Shopify SEO setup") |
|---|---|---|
| Question-based | how to, why does, what is | "how to set up SEO for Shopify" |
| Comparison | vs, compared to, alternative | "Shopify SEO vs WordPress SEO" |
| Audience-specific | for beginners, for small business | "Shopify SEO setup for beginners" |
| Action-based | guide, checklist, step by step | "Shopify SEO setup checklist" |
| Problem-based | not working, fix, improve | "Shopify SEO not working" |
Run each modified phrase through your keyword tool of choice and check the search volume and difficulty. You'll find that finding low competition keywords gets significantly faster when you start from specific modifiers rather than broad topics.
Long-tail variations of a seed keyword almost always have lower difficulty scores than the seed itself, and they often convert at a higher rate too.
Google's own search interface is one of the most underused keyword research tools available. Type your seed keyword into the search bar and pay attention to two things: the autocomplete suggestions that appear as you type, and the "related searches" section at the bottom of the results page.
These suggestions come directly from what real users search, which means they carry built-in demand. Write down every relevant suggestion, strip out anything too broad or clearly outside your niche, and add the rest to your keyword list for evaluation in Step 3.
Once you have a list of long-tail candidates, don't accept the keyword tool's difficulty score at face value. The real test is opening a browser, searching the keyword, and reading the actual results. A 60-second SERP review tells you more about whether you can rank than any single metric, because you're looking at the content itself and not just the backlinks pointing to it. This step separates the keywords worth pursuing from the ones that only look easy on paper.
Search each keyword in Google and scan the first page with a critical eye. You're checking for weak content you can clearly outperform and site types that signal low editorial standards. When you see forum threads, Reddit posts, or thin blog articles dominating the top ten, that's a strong signal the keyword is genuinely winnable for a focused, well-researched article.

If the top results look like they were written in 20 minutes, your thorough, well-structured article has a real shot at displacing them.
Here's what to check on each SERP:
After your SERP review, you need a quick scoring system to compare keywords without losing hours to analysis. Use this template to rate each candidate across four factors on a scale of 1 to 3, where 1 is most competitive and 3 is least:
| Factor | 1 (Hard) | 2 (Moderate) | 3 (Easy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content quality of top results | Thorough, well-structured | Decent but gaps exist | Thin or outdated |
| Domain authority of rankers | Mostly DA 60+ | Mixed DA range | Mostly DA below 40 |
| Intent match in results | All pages match exactly | Partial match | Few pages match |
| Backlinks to ranking pages | 50+ referring domains | 20 to 50 | Fewer than 20 |
Total your scores across the four factors. Keywords scoring 10 or higher are your strongest targets when finding low competition keywords worth building content around. Anything below 7 deserves a harder look before you commit time to writing it.
Your SERP audit has given you scored candidates. Now you need to narrow that list down to actual targets and sequence them so you're publishing in a logical order, not just reacting to whichever keyword feels right on a given day. A keyword list without a publishing plan is just a collection of good intentions.
Rank your scored keywords by combining your SERP audit score with the search volume from your keyword tool. High score plus even modest volume beats a low score plus high volume every time. You're optimizing for probability of ranking, not theoretical traffic ceiling.
Finding low competition keywords only pays off if you actually build content around them in a deliberate sequence.
Use this prioritization matrix to slot each keyword into a tier before you schedule anything:
| Tier | SERP Score | Monthly Volume | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority | 10 to 12 | Any | Write first |
| Strong | 8 to 9 | 100+ | Schedule within 30 days |
| Hold | 7 to 8 | Below 100 | Revisit in 60 days |
| Skip | Below 7 | Any | Remove from list |
Filter your full list through this matrix and pull out your top 10 to 15 priority and strong keywords. That's your first content sprint.
Take your filtered list and drop each keyword into a publishing calendar. Assign one article per keyword, set a target publish date, and keep the schedule realistic for your actual output capacity. If you can publish two pieces per week, plan for two per week consistently rather than five one week and zero the next.
Here's a simple weekly plan template you can copy directly:
Week 1: [Keyword 1] - Publish Monday | [Keyword 2] - Publish Thursday
Week 2: [Keyword 3] - Publish Monday | [Keyword 4] - Publish Thursday
Week 3: [Keyword 5] - Publish Monday | [Keyword 6] - Publish Thursday
Consistency compounds. A site publishing two focused, well-targeted articles per week will outgrow a site that publishes sporadically every time. Stick to your schedule, track what ranks after 60 to 90 days, and use those results to refine your next round of keyword selection.

Finding low competition keywords is a repeatable process, not a guessing game. You start with real buyer language, expand into specific long-tail variations, audit the actual SERP results, and then prioritize your targets into a publishing schedule that compounds over time. Each step in this system filters out the noise so you spend your writing time on keywords you can actually win.
The biggest leverage point is consistency. Running this process once and publishing three articles won't move the needle. Running it every month and stacking well-targeted content piece by piece will. Your domain authority builds, your internal links reinforce each other, and your traffic grows steadily rather than spiking and dropping.
If you want to skip the manual work and let a tool handle keyword discovery and content planning for you automatically every day, start your free trial of RankYak and see how fast your content library can grow.
Start today and generate your first article within 15 minutes.
SEO revenue calculator
How much revenue is your website leaving on the table?
Take a quick quiz and see exactly how much organic revenue you're missing out on, along with personalized tips to fix it.
Free · takes 1 minute · no signup needed
Question 1 of 4
Question 2 of 4
Question 3 of 4
Question 4 of 4
Your SEO growth potential
Extra visitors / month
after 6-12 months of consistent publishing
Revenue potential / year
at your niche's avg. conversion rate
Articles needed (12 mo)
to reach this traffic level
ROI with RankYak
at $99/mo ($1,188/year)
To hit that number, you'd need to:
RankYak handles all of this automatically, every day.
* Estimates based on industry averages. Results vary by niche, competition, and domain authority. Most SEO results become visible after 3-6 months of consistent publishing.